OVERVIEW
The similarity between Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) and quasars is reviewed. The events leading to the discovery of quasars are discussed, along with the initial controversy about quasar redshifts. The evidence for generation of tremendous amounts of energy in a small volume are discussed. Some of the physical processes in quasars are reviewed. The problem of understanding quasar geometries is discussed. The phenomenon of gravitationally-lensed quasars and their uses is discussed.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of this unit you should be able to:
2. Review how quasars were discovered.
3. Summarize the argument that concludes that large energies are produced in small volumes in quasars.
4. Discuss the sources of light in a quasar
5. Explain the reason for the difference in a radio loud and radio quiet quasar.
6. Explain the nature and consequences of the problem of understanding quasar geometries (viewing angles)
7. Describe how a gravitationally-lensed quasar arises.
¶ AGN
¶ Quasars
¶ QSOs
¶ broad emission lines
¶ broad line clouds
¶ radio jets
¶ supermassive black hole
¶ thermal radiation
¶ luminous
¶ large redshift
¶ accretion disks
¶ molecular torus
¶ broad emission lines
¶ synchrotron emission
¶ radio-loud quasar
¶ radio-quiet quasar
¶ quasar/AGN geometry
¶ gravitational lens
¶ The various types of active galaxies (which we will not discuss in detail) often contain very bright nuclei (the "nucleus" just means the center of hte galaxy). These are called Active Galactic Nuclei or AGN. AGN are too small and distant to be resolved. A galaxy surrounding an AGN is often so faint that it is difficult to see in the glare of the point-like, bright AGN.
¶ Quasars (sometimes referred to as QSOs or quasi-stellar objects) are high redshift objects that appear only as unresolved points of light through most earth-based telescopes. Quasars are the most luminous type of AGN.
¶ When quasars were first discovered in the late 1950s and early 1960s, it was not known what they were, since the galaxies they "live" in could not be seen for the bright glare of the quasar itself. Back then, it was not known if quasars even had a galaxy surrounding them or not. As telescope technology improved, there have been many examples where a faint galaxy was discovered surrounding a quasar. Quasars were finally known to be a kind of AGN.
¶ The redshift, usually designated by the letter z, is calculated by dividing the shift in wavelength of some spectral emission or absorption line by its true (rest) wavelength. By using the Special Theory of Relativity, the redshift can be used to calculate the speed at which a quasar appears to be moving away from an observer.
¶ The redshifts of some quasars were so high, corresponding to velocities of nearly 90% the speed of light, that they implied that the most distant quasars were as far away as 10 billion light years (the exact number depends on the adopted value of the Hubble constant and the cosmological model of the Universe the astronomers used).
¶ When these large distances were used with observations which showed that some quasars could double their luminosity within a day (which implies that quasars are relatively small--the bigger an object is, the longer it takes it to change its brightness in this way), it meant that if quasars were indeed at very large distances, they were capable of generating as much energy as could 100 Milky Way Galaxies in a volume not much bigger than the size of the Solar System!
· broad emission lines arise due to gas clouds moving nearly or exceeding one-tenth the speed of light.
· jets show matter being ejected at nearly the speed of
light.
¶ The gas in the center of the disk is so hot that it becomes ionized (electrically charged) and blows off a hot wind from the disk's surface. This wind gets funneled, possibly by magnetic fields or by the disk's shape, into two jets moving in opposite directions away from the disk. One blows off the top of the disk and the other blows off the bottom of the disk. These two jets carry a magnetic field along with them, making the charged particles spiral around slightly as they shoot outward. Whenever charged particles do this, they glow. This is called synchotron emission, and it is mostly radio waves (also a little infrared and visible light, but mostly radio). So these jets broadcast a radio signal, and we call them radio jets. The light from synchotron emission mostly shines in the direction the jet is moving, so you will only see the jet if it is moving somewhat towards you. We do not always see jets in quasars.
¶ There are clouds of gas orbiting
the black hole in several different directions. They get blasted
by the high energy X-ray and ultraviolet light from the accretion disk,
making them emit light in chemical spectra--specific spectral lines.
Because some clouds will be moving towards us and some will be moving away
from us at any given time, these spectral lines are both redshifted and
blueshifted, making them blur a bit and broaden. So we refer to these
as the Broad-Line Clouds. They are not a significant source
of light from the quasar.
¶ There are therefore two major sources of light from the quasar: (1) thermal radiation from the accretion disk and (2) synchotron radiation from the radio jets. The broad-line clouds don't add much light. Since thermal radiation is mostly X-ray, UV, and some visible light, and the synchotron radiation is mostly radio waves, with a little infrared & visible light, then adding these together gives a quasar a fairly flat, even spectrum. It emits light all the way from the longest wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum (radio) to the shortest wavelengths (gamma rays & X-rays--although I haven't mentioned it, quasars also emit gamma rays).
¶ Quasars are divided into two major categories: radio-loud and radio-quiet. Radio-loud quasars emit strong radio signals, and radio-quiet quasars emit little or no radio waves. Why is this? Since the radio waves are emitted mostly by the radio jets, then if the jets are weak or non-existent, there won't be a radio signal. Also, if the jets do not aim towards us at all, we might not see the light from them. So it could be a simple matter of our viewing angle, or it could be that some quasars do not have jets. This problem has not been solved yet.
¶ Viewing angle might also play a role in how we see the light from the accretion disk. If we look at the quasar so that the disk is edge-on, then the dusty molecular torus may completely block our view of it. If we instead look at the quasar so the disk is face-on, then we are looking through the hole of the dusty torus, and we see the quasar just fine. So there may be "hidden quasars" in some galxies where we have not yet seen them.
¶ Galaxy-galaxy collisions is also
probably an important process in some part of the quasar/AGN phenomenon.
The quasar's engine needs fuel (gas to fall into the accretion disk), and
eventually it could run out. Gas normally would orbit the quasar's
galaxy far away from the nucleus where the quasar is, so something needs
to make it fall in to the center. Collisions with other galaxies
might be needed to push more gas down into the quasar and get it running
again.
¶ Gravitational lensing occurs when light from a distant, high redshift quasar is bent around a lower redshift, foreground object like a galaxy. This gives rise to multiple quasar images.
For this lesson, you're responsible only for the material I covered, but use these parts of the book to help explain it:
Ch. 20: section 20.5. The paintings on pages 637 & 638 may be useful in showing you the accretion disk, jets, and dusty molecular torus.
HOMEWORK
No homework, just an in-class extra-credit assignment.