BACK: To REU Homepage
Science Ethics
In 2001, the National Science Foundation created the Societal Dimensions
of Engineering, Science, and Technology (SDEST) program. (you can view
the original NSF proposal paper here). The
SDEST aims to spur exploration of science ethic issues. As a result,
all NSF-funded REU programs are required to participate in some form of
ethics component.
Ethics Forum Participation and Guidelines:
Pitt Physics REU students participate in a half-day ethics forum attended
by undergrads from a variety of local REU programs.
-
REU students present a "scenario" (created in advance by them and approved
by Ethics Forum staff) to students from other REUs for a 12-minute
presentation period, followed by 8 minutes of audience questions
and discussion.
-
The following should be used as a guideline to the discussion:
- What are the relevant facts?
- What are the ethical issues?
- Who are the primary stakeholders?
- What are the possible alternatives?
- What are the ethics of the alternatives?
- What are the practical constraints?
- What actions should be taken?
- Other general questions?
- All group members should share in the 12-minute presentation, although
one group member should take clear "MC" responsibilities.
-
Students also prepare a written "case study" consisting of:
- Cover sheet (Names of group members, facilitator/mentor, date, and
ethical topic)
- One-page summary of the ethical issue researched (above questions
may be used as guideline)
- Reference page, with relevant journal articles or other reliable
sources (see links below for some resources)
A PDF version of the above participation information (created for Summer
2002) can be downloaded here.
Some online science ethics links
- "On
Being A Scientist".
The 1994 booklet on research ethics by the National
Academy of Sciences.
- Online Ethics.
The NSF-established online ethics center for engineering and science.
Contains information and case-studies in five general areas, including
diversity in the scientific/academic workplace.
- History of tenure in universities.
It can be argued that the highest moral standard in academia should be
Truth, and the discovery and dispensation of knowledge. This notion is
central to the story of the modern practice of university tenure.
- Secrecy in
Science
A 1999 Colloquium at MIT, sponsored by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science. Explores the tension between national security
interests (which tends to favor restriction of information on
biochemicals, weapons, and computer cryptography) versus traditional pure
science ethos (founded on the open and free sharing of knowledge). Very
timely in post 9/11 America, and important to everyone interested in
science. See also this
article from November 2003 about post-9/11 anti-bioterrorism regulations
having the unintended effect of squelching research and making criminals
out of scientists.
"The Language
Police", a recent (2003) book about textbook censorship, and a PBS interview with
the author.
Should American high school textbooks downplay evolution
as 'just a theory'? Should standardized test questions re-write
historical passages in the attempt to shield young readers from
'politically incorrect' terminology or potentially controversial words or
ideas? A new book has re-ignited this important ethical issue. Also see
this New York
Times article on the same issue. (Note: "Jerry Becker" is the person
who posted the article, not the NYT writer of it.) And a
recently-new website at U.
Berkeley has been set up to help teachers fend-off anti-evolutionist
rhetoric, and could give ample ethics-debate fodder.
- Medical
conflicts of interest